Mikkel Solberg
Netherlands flag

Mikkel Solberg

Volatility cycle and risk-adjusted allocator

Certified Badge Licensed

Rating

3.5

Reviews

14

Success Rate

75.62%

Total Portfolio PnL

+USD 37,809.58

USD 287.00 / monthly

+USD 5,614.49 / pnl this month

Min USD 1,180.00 | Max USD 20,069.00

Portfolio

Asset Invested (USD) Current (USD) PnL Trades
Bitcoin (BTC) 43,540.00 54,425.00 +10,885.00 84/123
NASDAQ 100 (US100) 72,580.00 91,450.80 +18,870.80 275/379
Gold Spot (XAUUSD) 39,387.00 50,415.36 +11,028.36 123/177
Euro / US Dollar (EURUSD) 23,193.00 26,440.02 +3,247.02 145/185
Solana (SOL) 37,612.00 33,850.80 -3,761.20 83/110
British Pound / US Dollar (GBPUSD) 24,604.00 22,143.60 -2,460.40 233/293

Ratings & Comments

Community feedback from active and past subscribers.

3.5 (14)
Daniel Reed

Daniel Reed

2026-03-07

4.0

In plain terms, Quick subscriber note with real numbers from my account. Capital deployed was about USD 14,541; latest estimate sits near USD 21,229.86. This review covers a completed cycle of around 45 days. So far it translates to about +USD 6,688.86 (46.00%), without unusual risk spikes. Reporting quality made it easier to stay objective through volatility. Losing setups were generally cut without emotional hesitation. Capital preservation clearly remained part of the decision framework. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. I closed this allocation and will decide on re-entry after observing another cycle.

Isaac Holt

Isaac Holt

2026-01-13

3.0

Subscriber perspective: Quick subscriber note with real numbers from my account. Capital deployed was about USD 16,678; latest estimate sits near USD 22,682.08. After about 114 days, I kept this allocation open. Current result is near +USD 6,004.08 (36.00%) with steady risk behavior across the cycle. Overall positive, though update cadence could improve during event-heavy sessions. The trade sequence looked structured instead of random signal hopping. For now, I would suggest caution before allocating larger capital here. Stops and de-risking looked predefined rather than improvised. I plan to continue one more cycle before deciding on scaling.

Sophia Hayes

Sophia Hayes

2026-02-05

3.0

It has been close to 149 days so far, with no redemption yet. My direct take: Sharing a structured review based on duration, drawdown, and communication quality. I started around USD 5,327, and the most recent value I saw was USD 4,368.14. I am down about -USD 958.86 (18.00%) currently, though downside was managed professionally. I expected tighter drawdown control than what I experienced. Good structure, with room for slightly cleaner timing in choppy markets. I noticed some hesitation on exits during quick reversals. I rarely felt left guessing about current risk posture. For now I am staying in and reassessing after the next review window.

Connor Gray

Connor Gray

2025-12-19

3.0

After tracking this closely, Posting this because I wanted to show what the cycle felt like. I have followed for about 69 days and the allocation is still active. The cycle is at roughly -USD 1,580.64 (16.00%), which is disappointing but not chaotic. I committed around USD 9,879, and the current valuation is roughly USD 8,298.36. The process is disciplined, but I would prefer more frequent interim notes. Trade timing was mixed and not always as clean as I wanted. Risk felt acceptable at times, but not consistently enforced. There were stretches where I had limited clarity on why sizing changed. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. I will keep this open for now, but I am monitoring risk closely.

Hannah Dean

Hannah Dean

2026-01-20

5.0

In plain terms, Quick subscriber note with real numbers from my account. Capital deployed was about USD 3,985; latest estimate sits near USD 5,419.60. After about 115 days, I kept this allocation open. So far it translates to about +USD 1,434.60 (36.00%), without unusual risk spikes. Drawdown handling appeared intentional and measured. Losing setups were generally cut without emotional hesitation. I appreciated that weaker trades were reported openly, not hidden. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. For now I am staying in and reassessing after the next review window.

Blake Ryan

Blake Ryan

2025-12-11

5.0

From my side, Quick subscriber note with real numbers from my account. Capital deployed was about USD 4,761; latest estimate sits near USD 5,141.88. After about 35 days, I kept this allocation open. At this stage I am up roughly +USD 380.88 (8.00%), which fits the stated risk profile. Losing setups were generally cut without emotional hesitation. I appreciated that weaker trades were reported openly, not hidden. Drawdown handling appeared intentional and measured. Still invested at the moment, with no plan to change size yet.

About This Agent

Professional background, certifications, risk framework, and strategy methodology.

Country

Netherlands flag Netherlands

Experience

9 years (since 2017)

Primary Market Focus

Mixed multi-asset trend basket

License / Registry

TRD-8F770D

Professional Summary

Mikkel manages a volatility cycle and risk-adjusted allocator program out of Amsterdam, Netherlands, combining structured research with disciplined execution. The current framework was built through years of trade journaling and post-cycle review, not by chasing one good month. Entries are staged in tranches so average fill quality improves while downside remains predefined. Trade plans are drafted before entry with explicit invalidation and partial take-profit rules.

Leverage use is conservative by design, especially around event-driven sessions. Drawdown handling is proactive, with reduced pace whenever market behavior becomes unstable. Subscribers receive practical notes on why a trade exists, how risk is managed, and what would invalidate the thesis. Weekly summaries highlight risk usage, hit-rate behavior, and why pacing changed. The profile is suited to investors who prioritize consistency and downside behavior.

Education & Credentials

  • Education: Frankfurt School - Digital Finance Programme
  • Certification: MiFID II Compliance & Conduct Training
  • Verified: Pending additional verification
  • Certified: Yes - strategy/capability badge active

Track Record Timeline

  • Started Trading: 2017
  • Career Origin: Cross-asset portfolio desk
  • Lead Manager Since: 2019
  • Reporting Style: Daily execution notes + weekly performance review

Risk & Strategy Framework

Risk model: Asymmetric setup selection with capped exposure

  • Volatility-adjusted position sizing on every setup
  • Partial-profit logic to protect realized gains
  • Execution quality tracking (slippage + timing)
  • Top-down regime filter before entry selection

Write a Review

Share your real experience with this expert. Your review helps other users choose safely.

Subscribe to this agent first to leave a review.

Report Mikkel Solberg

Reports are reviewed by our team. Please provide clear and honest details.

Hire Mikkel Solberg

Your agents balance: USD 0.00

Expert requirements

Min investment: USD 1,180.00 | Max investment: USD 20,069.00

Expert fee: USD 287.00 / monthly

Available:

Risk Warning

Trading with experts can be profitable but is highly risky. You may lose part or all of the invested amount. You can redeem anytime, but market outcomes can be negative. Platform and expert do not guarantee profit and are not responsible for losses. You decide if this risk level is acceptable.

Choose Trade Mode

Select Spot, Future, or Binary Options.