Logan Reeves
Norway flag

Logan Reeves

Event-driven equities setup analyst

Verified Badge Licensed

Rating

3.5

Reviews

7

Success Rate

71.50%

Total Portfolio PnL

+USD 73,957.98

USD 279.00 / monthly

+USD 11,804.81 / pnl this month

Min USD 148.00 | Max USD 25,801.00

Portfolio

Asset Invested (USD) Current (USD) PnL Trades
NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) 10,041.00 10,141.41 +100.41 161/239
Microsoft (MSFT) 83,998.00 111,717.34 +27,719.34 248/384
NASDAQ 100 (US100) 28,561.00 33,416.37 +4,855.37 237/331
British Pound / US Dollar (GBPUSD) 39,043.00 46,070.74 +7,027.74 193/252
XRP (XRP) 80,590.00 100,737.50 +20,147.50 185/266
Apple Inc. (AAPL) 82,986.00 97,093.62 +14,107.62 271/354

Ratings & Comments

Community feedback from active and past subscribers.

3.5 (7)
Clara Boyd

Clara Boyd

2025-12-02

3.0

After tracking this closely, Posting this because I wanted to show what the cycle felt like. I followed for around 41 days before redeeming and closing the cycle. The cycle is at roughly -USD 5,958.40 (32.00%), which is disappointing but not chaotic. I committed around USD 18,620, and the current valuation is roughly USD 12,661.60. Trade timing was mixed and not always as clean as I wanted. Reporting quality made it easier to stay objective through volatility. Risk felt acceptable at times, but not consistently enforced. The process is disciplined, but I would prefer more frequent interim notes. After closing, I prefer to wait for stronger consistency before returning.

Adrian Cole

Adrian Cole

2026-01-01

2.0

I tracked it for about 71 days and then closed the position. After tracking this closely, This review reflects measured performance and risk behavior over a full cycle. I started around USD 11,960, and the most recent value I saw was USD 9,687.60. The cycle is at roughly -USD 2,272.40 (19.00%), which is disappointing but not chaotic. I noticed some hesitation on exits during quick reversals. I needed faster risk-off reactions in this cycle, especially when momentum flipped abruptly. Performance was weaker than expected this round and needs better consistency. I closed with low confidence and would not currently recommend this profile. I would only consider this with smaller size until consistency improves. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. After closing, I prefer to wait for stronger consistency befor

Nina Hart

Nina Hart

2026-01-23

3.0

I tracked it for about 37 days and then closed the position. Quick context first: This review reflects measured performance and risk behavior over a full cycle. I started around USD 19,249, and the most recent value I saw was USD 28,103.54. Net outcome is around +USD 8,854.54 (46.00%), and the path there felt controlled. Execution quality stayed fairly consistent even during fast sessions. Update notes were concise and useful when exposure changed. Net-net acceptable for me, but there are clear areas that should improve. There was no emotional averaging, which I value a lot. Now that I exited, I would still consider re-entry in a future cycle.

Ivy Turner

Ivy Turner

2026-01-14

4.0

From my side, I will keep this straightforward. At this stage I am up roughly +USD 2,557.39 (11.00%), which fits the stated risk profile. Starting allocation was near USD 23,249; latest value came to about USD 25,806.39. After approximately 79 days, I decided to end this allocation. Weekly context helped me understand why pacing changed. Risk limits were respected and I did not notice reckless leverage. Most decisions felt process-driven rather than emotional. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. After redeeming, I would classify this as disciplined but mixed.

Eli West

Eli West

2026-01-08

2.0

From my side, Short version: this review is from my own capital allocation. Capital deployed was about USD 7,836; latest estimate sits near USD 5,171.76. After about 204 days, I kept this allocation open. At the moment I am around -USD 2,664.24 (34.00%). Not ideal, but management stayed controlled. I was not fully satisfied with results despite acceptable risk discipline. Reporting could be more detailed, especially around losing periods. For my goals, this was not a satisfactory allocation cycle. Position sizing occasionally felt too aggressive for my profile. For now, I would suggest caution before allocating larger capital here. There were sessions where execution timing looked slower than expected. Still invested at the moment, with no plan to change size yet.

Ryan Brooks

Ryan Brooks

2026-02-05

5.0

Subscriber perspective: I will keep this straightforward. Current result is near +USD 316.62 (6.00%) with steady risk behavior across the cycle. Starting allocation was near USD 5,277; latest value came to about USD 5,593.62. My position has stayed live for approximately 137 days. Risk limits were respected and I did not notice reckless leverage. Entries were usually at planned zones rather than late chases. Weekly context helped me understand why pacing changed. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. I plan to continue one more cycle before deciding on scaling.

Naomi Ross

Naomi Ross

2026-01-07

4.0

Subscriber perspective: Short version: this review is from my own capital allocation. Capital deployed was about USD 23,398; latest estimate sits near USD 22,696.06. After about 50 days, I kept this allocation open. Result sits near -USD 701.94 (3.00%), yet I did not see reckless behavior. Reporting quality made it easier to stay objective through volatility. Entries were usually at planned zones rather than late chases. Capital preservation clearly remained part of the decision framework. I would still recommend this to users who care more about process discipline than hype. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. I plan to continue one more cycle before deciding on scaling.

About This Agent

Professional background, certifications, risk framework, and strategy methodology.

Country

Norway flag Norway

Experience

15 years (since 2011)

Primary Market Focus

Crypto majors and high-liquidity alts

License / Registry

TRD-A68903

Professional Summary

Logan manages a event-driven equities setup analyst program out of Oslo, Norway, combining structured research with disciplined execution. The current framework was built through years of trade journaling and post-cycle review, not by chasing one good month. Setups are filtered through structure, momentum, and liquidity checks before any exposure is added. Trend participation is balanced with pullback discipline to avoid late, emotional entries.

Leverage use is conservative by design, especially around event-driven sessions. Drawdown handling is proactive, with reduced pace whenever market behavior becomes unstable. Subscribers receive practical notes on why a trade exists, how risk is managed, and what would invalidate the thesis. The profile is suited to investors who prioritize consistency and downside behavior. Additional context: Logan manages a event-driven equities setup analyst program out of Oslo, Norway, combining structured research with disciplined execution.

Education & Credentials

  • Education: Frankfurt School - Digital Finance Programme
  • Certification: MiFID II Compliance & Conduct Training
  • Verified: Yes - identity and profile validated
  • Certified: Not certified yet

Track Record Timeline

  • Started Trading: 2011
  • Career Origin: Institutional execution desk
  • Lead Manager Since: 2012
  • Reporting Style: Daily execution notes + weekly performance review

Risk & Strategy Framework

Risk model: Defensive posture during unstable market structure

  • No-trade discipline when market quality is weak
  • Liquidity-first instrument selection
  • Volatility-adjusted position sizing on every setup
  • Partial-profit logic to protect realized gains

Write a Review

Share your real experience with this expert. Your review helps other users choose safely.

Subscribe to this agent first to leave a review.

Report Logan Reeves

Reports are reviewed by our team. Please provide clear and honest details.

Hire Logan Reeves

Your agents balance: USD 0.00

Expert requirements

Min investment: USD 148.00 | Max investment: USD 25,801.00

Expert fee: USD 279.00 / monthly

Available:

Risk Warning

Trading with experts can be profitable but is highly risky. You may lose part or all of the invested amount. You can redeem anytime, but market outcomes can be negative. Platform and expert do not guarantee profit and are not responsible for losses. You decide if this risk level is acceptable.

Choose Trade Mode

Select Spot, Future, or Binary Options.