Jonas Keller
United States flag

Jonas Keller

Event-driven equities setup analyst

Verified Badge Licensed

Rating

3.5

Reviews

11

Success Rate

87.15%

Total Portfolio PnL

+USD 33,548.26

USD 272.00 / monthly

+USD 12,652.85 / pnl this month

Min USD 149.00 | Max USD 25,398.00

Portfolio

Asset Invested (USD) Current (USD) PnL Trades
XRP (XRP) 21,507.00 24,733.05 +3,226.05 208/263
Gold Spot (XAUUSD) 36,937.00 36,198.26 -738.74 188/224
Euro / US Dollar (EURUSD) 49,014.00 44,112.60 -4,901.40 233/258
Ethereum (ETH) 28,281.00 34,785.63 +6,504.63 82/88
WTI Crude Oil (USOIL) 81,827.00 111,284.72 +29,457.72 227/267

Ratings & Comments

Community feedback from active and past subscribers.

3.5 (11)
Eli West

Eli West

2026-03-18

3.0

After tracking this closely, I do not usually write long reviews, but this one should help others. I followed for around 19 days before redeeming and closing the cycle. The cycle is at roughly -USD 1,976.00 (16.00%), which is disappointing but not chaotic. I committed around USD 12,350, and the current valuation is roughly USD 10,374.00. I appreciated that weaker trades were reported openly, not hidden. Risk felt acceptable at times, but not consistently enforced. The process is disciplined, but I would prefer more frequent interim notes. Trade timing was mixed and not always as clean as I wanted. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. After closing, I prefer to wait for stronger consistency before returning.

Ruby Price

Ruby Price

2025-12-11

3.0

For anyone considering this agent, I will keep this straightforward. Current drawdown is about -USD 2,030.72 (19.00%), but risk handling remained disciplined. Starting allocation was near USD 10,688; latest value came to about USD 8,657.28. After approximately 52 days, I decided to end this allocation. Net-net acceptable for me, but there are clear areas that should improve. The sequence occasionally felt reactive rather than fully planned. Some reductions came later than I was comfortable with. I would not recommend this for conservative users at the moment. Update notes were concise and useful when exposure changed. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. Now that I exited, I would still consider re-entry in a future cycle.

Ryan Brooks

Ryan Brooks

2026-03-12

3.0

Based on my own allocation, I kept notes through this cycle, so this review is based on actual observations. I stayed in for roughly 61 days, then exited. I entered with approximately USD 2,239, and the recent mark shows about USD 1,858.37. At the moment I am around -USD 380.63 (17.00%). Not ideal, but management stayed controlled. A few entries felt late, especially after momentum was already extended. Position sizing occasionally felt too aggressive for my profile. I would not recommend this for conservative users at the moment. I rarely felt left guessing about current risk posture. I would still like faster reactions during sudden reversals, but the framework is solid. After redeeming, I would classify this as disciplined but mixed.

Connor Gray

Connor Gray

2026-02-20

5.0

Personal note: I kept notes through this cycle, so this review is based on actual observations. I stayed in for roughly 88 days, then exited. I entered with approximately USD 3,495, and the recent mark shows about USD 4,473.60. Current result is near +USD 978.60 (28.00%) with steady risk behavior across the cycle. Position sizing stayed controlled even when the market got noisy. I rarely felt left guessing about current risk posture. Position management looked deliberate, especially around volatile hours. Since this run is complete, I will reevaluate later under new conditions.

Nina Hart

Nina Hart

2026-03-16

2.0

For anyone considering this agent, Real account, real outcome, direct feedback below. Current drawdown is about -USD 2,518.74 (18.00%), but risk handling remained disciplined. Starting allocation was near USD 13,993; latest value came to about USD 11,474.26. After approximately 86 days, I decided to end this allocation. Unless execution improves materially, I will stay out after this run. The sequence occasionally felt reactive rather than fully planned. Some reductions came later than I was comfortable with. I needed faster risk-off reactions in this cycle, especially when momentum flipped abruptly. The outcome did not meet my target, even if risk control was still present. Communication quality was inconsistent from week to week. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. Now that I exited, I would still con

Aria Scott

Aria Scott

2026-01-17

2.0

I tracked it for about 89 days and then closed the position. Based on my own allocation, Sharing a structured review based on duration, drawdown, and communication quality. I started around USD 17,447, and the most recent value I saw was USD 14,306.54. At the moment I am around -USD 3,140.46 (18.00%). Not ideal, but management stayed controlled. For my goals, this was not a satisfactory allocation cycle. Reporting could be more detailed, especially around losing periods. I reduced confidence after this run and will keep future allocations smaller unless results stabilize. Position sizing occasionally felt too aggressive for my profile. Performance was weaker than expected this round and needs better consistency. I tracked this weekly against my own notes, not just daily PnL screenshots. I am being strict here because I care more about consistency than occasional upside spikes. After rede

Maya Flynn

Maya Flynn

2026-03-06

4.0

I tracked it for about 54 days and then closed the position. Based on my own allocation, This review reflects measured performance and risk behavior over a full cycle. I started around USD 7,203, and the most recent value I saw was USD 8,499.54. At this stage I am up roughly +USD 1,296.54 (18.00%), which fits the stated risk profile. Comments around invalidation and risk reductions were practical. Execution quality stayed fairly consistent even during fast sessions. Exposure was not pushed beyond what felt reasonable for this profile. Market conditions were not easy during this period, so process quality mattered more to me than a single snapshot result. After redeeming, I would classify this as disciplined but mixed.

Lily Quinn

Lily Quinn

2026-02-06

4.0

My initial size was close to USD 12,770, with current value around USD 13,280.80. From my side, I do not trust glossy stats, so this review is based on real execution behavior. The subscription has been running for roughly 206 days on my side. At this stage I am up roughly +USD 510.80 (4.00%), which fits the stated risk profile. Reporting quality made it easier to stay objective through volatility. The trade sequence looked structured instead of random signal hopping. Capital preservation clearly remained part of the decision framework. Still invested at the moment, with no plan to change size yet.

About This Agent

Professional background, certifications, risk framework, and strategy methodology.

Country

United States flag United States

Experience

10 years (since 2016)

Primary Market Focus

Event-driven cross-asset rotation

License / Registry

TRD-51745B

Professional Summary

Jonas is based in San Diego, United States and runs a event-driven equities setup analyst mandate with consistency as the first priority. This profile gradually moved from high-frequency activity to selective execution with clearer invalidation. Correlation checks are part of portfolio construction so multiple positions do not become one hidden bet. The model accepts inactive sessions instead of forcing trades when edge quality is weak.

Risk is capped per idea with volatility-adjusted sizing and predefined de-risk triggers. Capital defense comes first: when conditions degrade, selectivity rises and size falls quickly. Post-trade reviews explain whether outcomes came from process quality or temporary market tailwind. Updates are written in plain language so users can track logic without needing institutional trading background. It is usually a strong match for subscribers who value structure, patience, and transparent risk decisions.

Education & Credentials

  • Education: University of Chicago - Financial Markets Certificate
  • Certification: Algorithmic Trading Certificate (EPAT)
  • Verified: Yes - identity and profile validated
  • Certified: Not certified yet

Track Record Timeline

  • Started Trading: 2016
  • Career Origin: Macro strategy research desk
  • Lead Manager Since: 2017
  • Reporting Style: Session summaries + monthly drawdown audit

Risk & Strategy Framework

Risk model: Capital preservation first, moderate growth second

  • Top-down regime filter before entry selection
  • Correlation checks to prevent hidden concentration
  • Post-trade review loop for process improvement
  • Risk compression before high-impact macro events

Write a Review

Share your real experience with this expert. Your review helps other users choose safely.

Subscribe to this agent first to leave a review.

Report Jonas Keller

Reports are reviewed by our team. Please provide clear and honest details.

Hire Jonas Keller

Your agents balance: USD 0.00

Expert requirements

Min investment: USD 149.00 | Max investment: USD 25,398.00

Expert fee: USD 272.00 / monthly

Available:

Risk Warning

Trading with experts can be profitable but is highly risky. You may lose part or all of the invested amount. You can redeem anytime, but market outcomes can be negative. Platform and expert do not guarantee profit and are not responsible for losses. You decide if this risk level is acceptable.

Choose Trade Mode

Select Spot, Future, or Binary Options.